As a decision-making expert with a focus on organizational behavior, I often delve into various models that attempt to explain how decisions are made within complex systems. One such model, the Garbage Can Model, is a unique framework that challenges the traditional, rational approaches to decision-making. It was developed by James G. March and Johan P. Olsen in the 1970s, and it presents a more chaotic and less structured view of the decision-making process.

In the Garbage Can Model, organizations are viewed as being composed of multiple, semi-autonomous streams of problems, solutions, participants, and choices. These streams operate somewhat independently of each other, and decisions are made when these streams intersect. The model suggests that decision-making is not a linear process where a problem leads to a solution, but rather a process where problems and solutions are constantly in flux and decisions are made when they happen to come together.

The model highlights several key components:


1. Problems: These are the issues or challenges that organizations face. In the garbage can model, problems are not static; they evolve and change over time, and they may be redefined or even disappear as new information becomes available.


2. Solutions: These are the potential answers or responses to problems. Unlike the rational model, where solutions are developed in response to specific problems, in the garbage can model, solutions may exist independently of problems and are brought to the attention of decision-makers when the opportunity arises.


3. Participants: These are the individuals or groups who are involved in the decision-making process. Participants have their own preferences, agendas, and information, which they bring to the decision-making table.


4. Choice Opportunities: These are the moments when decisions are made. They are not necessarily tied to specific problems or solutions but occur when the streams of problems, solutions, and participants come together.


5. Flow of Issues: The model emphasizes the fluid nature of issues within an organization. Problems and solutions are not neatly packaged but are constantly moving and evolving.

The Garbage Can Model suggests that decisions are not always made rationally or with complete information. Instead, they are often the result of chance encounters between problems and solutions. This model acknowledges the complexity and unpredictability of organizational decision-making, where decisions can be influenced by a wide range of factors, including the timing of events, the availability of resources, and the personal preferences of participants.

One of the strengths of the garbage can model is its ability to explain why organizations sometimes make decisions that seem irrational or suboptimal from an outsider's perspective. It accounts for the fact that organizations are not always able to process all the information they have, and decision-makers may not have a clear understanding of all the problems and solutions available to them.

However, the model also has its limitations. It can be criticized for being too chaotic and lacking a clear mechanism for how decisions are actually made. It may not fully account for the role of leadership and strategic planning in guiding decision-making within organizations.

In conclusion, the Garbage Can Model offers a valuable perspective on decision-making within organizations, emphasizing the role of chance, the fluidity of issues, and the interplay between problems, solutions, and participants. It challenges the traditional rational model and provides a more nuanced understanding of the complexities inherent in organizational decision-making.

read more >>

The garbage can model is an irrational model of decision-making, which assumes that problems, solutions and participants are disconnected and exist as separate organizational streams. Choice opportunities are initiated by the organization, but none or few problems may be solved in the process and then only by chance.read more >>