As a legal expert, I can provide you with a detailed explanation of the time a person can be held in jail without a trial. The length of time a person can be detained without a trial varies significantly depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In the United States, the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the right to a speedy trial. However, the interpretation and application of this right can differ from state to state and from case to case.

The Sixth Amendment states that "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial." This right is intended to protect individuals from prolonged detention without being formally charged and tried. The Supreme Court has further clarified the meaning of a "speedy trial" through various decisions.

One of the key cases is the 1972 Supreme Court case of Barker v. Wingo, which established a four-part test to determine whether a defendant's right to a speedy trial has been violated. The factors considered in this test are:


1. Length of Delay: The longer the delay, the more likely it is that the right to a speedy trial has been violated. However, there is no specific number of days that automatically constitutes a violation.


2. Reason for the Delay: If the delay is caused by the prosecution, it may weigh more heavily against the state. Conversely, if the defendant or their attorney is responsible for the delay, it may not be considered a violation.


3. Defendant's Assertion of the Right: If the defendant has actively sought a speedy trial and has been denied it, this factor weighs in favor of finding a violation.


4. Prejudice to the Defendant: If the defendant can show that the delay has caused them harm, such as the loss of evidence, deterioration of their defense, or the anxiety of pretrial detention, this factor may be considered.

In addition to the Barker v. Wingo test, the Supreme Court has also recognized that there are exceptions to the right to a speedy trial. For example, in Doggett v. United States (1992), the Court ruled that a defendant's right to a speedy trial can be tolled, or paused, during the period of time when a defendant is in custody on other charges.

It is also important to note that in some cases, the defense may waive the right to a speedy trial. This can occur for various reasons, such as when the defense believes that additional time is needed to prepare for trial or when they are negotiating a plea agreement with the prosecution.

Furthermore, the length of time a person can be held without a trial may be influenced by procedural rules and statutes. For instance, some jurisdictions have specific time limits for bringing a case to trial after an indictment or information has been filed. If these time limits are exceeded, the defendant may be entitled to dismissal of the charges.

In conclusion, the length of time a person can be held in jail without a trial is not fixed and depends on a variety of factors, including the specific legal protections in place, the reasons for the delay, and the actions of both the prosecution and the defense. It is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the particular circumstances of each case.

read more >>

If this person is still in jail after 120 days, then the State has probably already filed formal charges. You need to find out if the Public Defender has "waived the right to a speedy trial." If not, then the State has approximately six months to bring the Defendant to trial.Jun 30, 2010read more >>