As an expert in the field of cognitive psychology, I'm often asked about the distinctions between concrete and abstract thinking. These two modes of thought are fundamental to how we process and understand the world around us. Let's delve into the nuances of each.
Concrete thinking is the process of dealing with specific, tangible objects and situations. It's the way we understand and interact with the physical world around us. When we use concrete thinking, we're dealing with things we can see, touch, smell, taste, or hear. For example, if you're deciding which apple to buy at the grocery store, you might use concrete thinking to assess the color, texture, and weight of the apple. It's about the here and now, and it's the type of thinking that young children often use before they develop more advanced cognitive skills.
On the other hand, abstract thinking is a more complex and sophisticated form of cognition. It involves the manipulation of concepts and ideas that are not directly observable or present. Abstract thinking allows us to consider possibilities, solve complex problems, and engage in creative endeavors. It's the kind of thinking that allows us to understand things like mathematics, philosophy, and theoretical physics. For instance, when you're contemplating the concept of justice or the nature of time, you're engaging in abstract thinking.
One of the key differences between the two is that concrete thinking is often tied to immediate sensory experience, while abstract thinking requires a level of mental abstraction. For example, a child might understand that a ball is round and bounces because they can see and touch it (concrete thinking), but understanding the concept of gravity that makes the ball bounce is an abstract idea.
Jean Piaget, a pioneering developmental psychologist, used the terms "concrete" and "formal" to describe different stages of cognitive development. According to Piaget, children progress from using concrete thinking, which is based on direct experiences, to formal operational thinking, which involves abstract reasoning and the ability to think hypothetically.
It's important to note that both types of thinking are crucial for human cognition. While concrete thinking allows us to navigate the physical world, abstract thinking opens up a realm of possibilities for innovation, problem-solving, and understanding complex systems. The development from concrete to abstract thinking is a significant milestone in cognitive growth and is associated with the maturation of the brain's prefrontal cortex.
In summary, concrete thinking is about dealing with the tangible and immediate, while abstract thinking is about engaging with the intangible and theoretical. Both are essential for a well-rounded understanding of the world and for the ability to function effectively in various aspects of life.

read more >>

Jean Piaget uses the terms "concrete" and "formal" to describe the different types of learning. Concrete thinking involves facts and descriptions about everyday, tangible objects, while abstract (formal operational) thinking involves a mental process. Concrete idea. Abstract idea. Dense things sink.read more >>