As a linguistic expert with a deep understanding of the evolution of the English language, I am well-equipped to delve into the intricacies of word usage and the reasons behind it. The term "persons" is indeed an interesting case study in the dynamics of language change and the subtle distinctions that can arise in formal and informal contexts.

The English language, like any other, is a living, breathing entity that evolves over time. It is shaped by a myriad of factors, including cultural shifts, technological advancements, and the influence of other languages. The plural form of "person" is a prime example of how language can adapt and change to suit the needs and preferences of its speakers.

Historically, "persons" was the correct plural form of "person" in English. This usage can be traced back to Old and Middle English, where it was common to add an "s" to form the plural of many nouns. However, as the language developed and underwent various influences, particularly from French and Latin, the plural form "people" began to emerge and gain acceptance.

The shift from "persons" to "people" can be attributed to several linguistic phenomena. One such phenomenon is analogy, where a word's form is influenced by the forms of other similar words. In this case, "people" may have been influenced by the plural forms of other nouns ending in "-en," such as "children" and "oxen." Additionally, "people" has a more collective sense, which aligns well with the collective nature of the concept it represents.

Another factor that contributed to the acceptance of "people" as the plural of "person" is the influence of other languages. English has borrowed heavily from Latin and French, and in both of these languages, the equivalent of "people" is used as the plural form. This foreign influence likely played a role in the gradual adoption of "people" in English.

It is also worth noting that the use of "persons" versus "people" can be influenced by the context in which it is used. In formal and legal contexts, "persons" may still be preferred due to its historical accuracy and precision. For example, legal documents and formal agreements often use "persons" to denote a specific number of individuals, as it can convey a sense of exactitude and formality.

On the other hand, "people" is more commonly used in everyday speech and informal writing. It is seen as more natural and less cumbersome, and it has become the default plural form for most English speakers.

In conclusion, the use of "persons" as a word is a testament to the fluidity and adaptability of language. It reflects the historical development of English and the various influences that have shaped its vocabulary and grammar. While "people" has become the widely accepted plural form of "person," the continued use of "persons" in certain contexts highlights the importance of precision and formality in language.

read more >>

Traditionally, persons was the correct plural of person, but people has become widely accepted as such. One rule that is sometimes used is to use persons if the number of people is countable and people otherwise. However, this is generally only used in formal and legal contexts.Apr 13, 2017read more >>