As an expert in cognitive psychology and philosophy, I've spent considerable time studying the intricacies of human thought processes. The question you've posed is quite thought-provoking: What is the opposite of a logical thinker? To address this, we must first understand the essence of logical thinking and then explore its antithesis.
Logical thinking, as you've mentioned, is a method of reasoning that relies on the principles of logic and evidence. It's a systematic process that involves the application of critical thinking to derive conclusions from a set of premises. This process is characterized by its predictability, consistency, and adherence to the rules of deductive reasoning. Logical thinkers are often seen as analytical, objective, and precise in their approach to problem-solving.
Now, to consider the opposite of a logical thinker, we must look at the characteristics that would contrast with those of a logical thinker. Here are several aspects to consider:


1. Emotional Thinking: While emotions are not inherently the opposite of logic, they can lead to a form of thinking that is less predictable and more subjective. Emotional thinking is driven by feelings and can often bypass the structured approach of logical reasoning. It is important to note that emotions are a natural part of human cognition and can influence, but not entirely replace, logical thought.


2. Intuitive Thinking: Intuition is a form of cognition that operates quickly and automatically, often without conscious awareness. It is the opposite of the deliberate, step-by-step process of logical thinking. Intuitive thinkers may arrive at conclusions swiftly, based on a gut feeling or a hunch, rather than through a methodical analysis of facts.


3. Creative Thinking: Creativity often involves thinking outside the box and making connections that logical reasoning might not immediately see. While creativity can coexist with logic, it is characterized by its ability to transcend traditional boundaries and generate novel ideas that may not be immediately verifiable or deducible through logical means.


4. Impulsive Thinking: This type of thinking is characterized by a lack of forethought and planning. Impulsive thinkers may make decisions without considering the consequences or the logical implications of their actions. It stands in stark contrast to the careful, calculated approach of a logical thinker.


5. Superstitious Thinking: Superstition is a belief or behavior that is not based on empirical evidence or logical reasoning. Superstitious thinkers may adhere to rituals or beliefs that have no basis in logic, often as a result of cultural or personal biases.


6. Dogmatic Thinking: Dogmatism involves holding onto beliefs without questioning or being open to alternative viewpoints. It is the antithesis of the open-mindedness and critical evaluation that is a hallmark of logical thinking.

7.
Chaotic Thinking: This refers to a thought process that is disorganized and lacks a clear direction or purpose. It is the opposite of the structured and goal-oriented approach of logical thinking.

In conclusion, while there isn't a single term that encapsulates the opposite of a logical thinker, we can identify several forms of thinking that contrast with the structured, evidence-based approach of logical thinking. These include emotional, intuitive, creative, impulsive, superstitious, dogmatic, and chaotic thinking. It's important to recognize that these forms of thinking are not inherently bad or inferior; they simply represent different cognitive processes that humans use to navigate the world.

read more >>

Logical thought is based on a conscious deductive reasoning from facts (or assumed facts, i.e. axioms). It is a process that is open to verification by others. ... Are emotions the opposite of logic? They certainly come from different cognitive processes, one which can be open to interrogation and the other largely closed.read more >>