Hi there! I'm Professor Oak, a leading expert in the field of Pokémon typology. I've dedicated my life to understanding the intricate relationships between different Pokémon types, and I'm always thrilled to share my knowledge.
You want to know what type is immune to Ghost? That's a question that often sparks confusion among trainers, and for good reason! The answer has evolved over the generations of Pokémon games.
Let's dive into the history:
In the first generation of Pokémon games (Red, Blue, Yellow),
Ghost-type moves were super effective against
Psychic-types, and there was no type that was completely immune to them. This led to some infamous battles where
Gengar wreaked havoc on unsuspecting
Alakazam.
However, things changed dramatically in Generation II (Gold, Silver, Crystal) with the introduction of the
Dark-type. This new type was specifically designed to counter the then-overpowered
Psychic-type. As part of this balancing act,
Dark-type Pokémon became completely
immune to
Ghost-type moves. This meant that Pokémon like
Umbreon and
Tyranitar could stand their ground against even the spookiest of
Gengar.
So, to answer your question directly:
Dark-type Pokémon are
immune to
Ghost-type moves.
This immunity has remained a core aspect of the Pokémon type chart ever since its introduction in Generation II. It's an important strategic element that adds depth and complexity to battles. Knowing which types are immune to others can be the key to victory, especially in competitive battles.
However, it's important to remember that immunity doesn't mean invincibility . While
Dark-types don't take damage from
Ghost moves, they can still be hit by moves of other types. For example, a
Fighting-type move will still be super effective against a
Dark-type, even though it's immune to
Ghost.
So, there you have it! The world of Pokémon typing can be intricate, but understanding these relationships is key to becoming a true Pokémon Master. Keep training hard and studying the type chart, and you'll be well on your way to victory!
read more >>