As a transportation safety expert with extensive experience in analyzing various modes of transportation, I can provide a comprehensive answer to your question regarding the safety of train travel compared to driving.
First, let's consider the statistics. According to the National Safety Council, the risk of dying in a motor vehicle accident is about 1 in 107. The risk of dying in a train accident is significantly lower, at about 1 in 1,950,000. This means that statistically, train travel is much safer than driving.
However, it's important to note that the perception of safety can be influenced by high-profile incidents, such as the Amtrak crash mentioned. While such incidents can raise concerns, they should be viewed in the context of the overall safety record of train travel. The rarity of these incidents actually underscores the relative safety of trains.
Another factor to consider is the concept of "passenger miles." This is a measure that takes into account both the number of passengers and the distance traveled. When comparing different modes of transportation, it's more meaningful to look at the number of fatalities per billion passenger miles. By this measure, trains are still much safer than cars. For example, a 500-mile trip on a plane carrying 100 people would be equivalent in passenger miles to someone driving a 500-mile car trip alone 100 times. This illustrates the significant difference in risk between the two modes of transportation.
In addition to the statistical evidence, there are several reasons why trains are considered safer than cars. Trains are subject to strict regulations and oversight, which helps to ensure their safety. They operate on dedicated tracks, which eliminates the risk of collisions with other vehicles. Furthermore, trains have advanced safety features such as automatic braking systems and collision avoidance technology.
On the other hand, driving involves a higher degree of human error. Distracted driving, speeding, and drunk driving are all significant risks that contribute to the higher accident rate for cars. Moreover, cars are subject to more variables, such as weather conditions and road quality, which can affect safety.
However, it's worth noting that there are some circumstances where driving might be considered safer. For example, if you're traveling a short distance in a safe area, the risk of an accident might be lower than taking a train. But in general, when comparing the two modes of transportation over a significant distance, train travel is the safer option.
In conclusion, while no mode of transportation is completely risk-free, the evidence strongly suggests that train travel is safer than driving. The statistical data, the concept of passenger miles, and the inherent safety features of trains all support this conclusion. It's important to keep in mind that individual experiences and perceptions can vary, but when considering the overall safety of each mode of transportation, trains come out ahead.
read more >>

Tuesday's Amtrak crash raises concerns about transportation safety. But statistically speaking, trains are actually a very safe way to travel -- much safer than driving. ... So a 500-mile trip on a plane carrying 100 people would be equivalent in passenger miles to someone driving a 500 mile car trip alone 100 times.May 13, 2015read more >>