As an expert in the field of computer science with a focus on operating systems, I'm well-versed in the intricacies of multitasking. Let's delve into the concept of multitasking within operating systems (OS) and explore the differences between preemptive and cooperative multitasking.
Multitasking is a fundamental feature of modern operating systems that allows multiple processes to share a computer's resources. This capability is crucial for running multiple applications simultaneously, enhancing the efficiency and functionality of the computer system.

### Preemptive Multitasking
Preemptive multitasking is a method where the operating system has control over the allocation of the CPU to different processes. The OS can interrupt a running process and allocate the CPU to another process at any time. This is achieved through a scheduler that manages the execution of processes based on priority levels and time slices.

#### Key Features of Preemptive Multitasking:
- Control by OS: The operating system has full control over the CPU and can preempt any process.
- Priority-Based Scheduling: Processes are scheduled based on their priority levels.
- Time Slices: Each process is given a specific amount of time to execute, after which the CPU is allocated to another process.
- Responsiveness: The system remains responsive as the OS can quickly switch between processes.

### Cooperative Multitasking
Cooperative multitasking, on the other hand, relies on processes voluntarily relinquishing control of the CPU. In this model, a process must yield control back to the OS before another process can run. If a process does not yield, it can monopolize the CPU, leading to a lack of responsiveness.

#### Key Features of Cooperative Multitasking:
- Voluntary Yielding: Processes must willingly give up the CPU for other processes to run.
- Potential for Starvation: If a process does not yield, other processes may not get a chance to execute.
- Simplicity: The implementation is simpler as there's no need for a complex scheduler.
- Lack of Control: The OS has less control over process execution, leading to potential issues with uncooperative processes.

### Examples of Operating Systems Using These Methods:
- **OS/2, Windows 95, Windows NT, the Amiga operating system, and UNIX**: These systems implement preemptive multitasking. For instance, Windows NT introduced a robust preemptive multitasking model that allowed for better stability and performance.
- **Microsoft Windows 3.x and the MultiFinder for Macintosh computers**: These systems used cooperative multitasking. Windows 3.x, for example, had limitations in multitasking capabilities because it relied on the applications to cooperatively yield control.

### Conclusion
The choice between preemptive and cooperative multitasking depends on the design goals of the operating system and the hardware it's running on. Preemptive multitasking provides a more robust and predictable environment, which is essential for server environments and systems where stability and responsiveness are critical. Cooperative multitasking can be simpler to implement but requires careful programming to ensure that all processes get a fair share of CPU time.

Now, let's transition to the Chinese translation of the above explanation.

read more >>

OS/2, Windows 95, Windows NT, the Amiga operating system and UNIX use preemptive multitasking, whereas Microsoft Windows 3.x and the MultiFinder (for Macintosh computers) use cooperative multitasking.read more >>