Hello, I'm Colonel Michael Turner (Ret.), and I dedicated over 30 years of my life to serving in the United States Army. My career encompassed various combat deployments and extensive experience in small arms and ammunition, allowing me to witness the evolution of warfare and the ethical considerations surrounding lethal force.

The question of hollow point bullets being used in war is complex and often misunderstood. To provide a comprehensive answer, we need to delve into the history, mechanics, and international laws that govern ammunition use in warfare.

What are Hollow Point Bullets?

Hollow point bullets, also known as expanding bullets, are designed to expand significantly upon impact. This expansion serves two primary purposes:


1. Increased Stopping Power: The expanded bullet creates a larger wound cavity, transferring more energy upon impact and increasing the likelihood of incapacitating the target quickly.


2. Reduced Penetration: The expansion also limits over-penetration, meaning the bullet is less likely to pass through the target and potentially harm someone or something behind it.

These characteristics make hollow points popular in civilian law enforcement and self-defense scenarios. The goal is to neutralize the threat effectively while minimizing the risk to bystanders.

**The Hague Conventions and the Laws of War**

The use of ammunition in warfare is governed by international law, primarily the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. Specifically, the Hague Declaration concerning Expanding Bullets prohibits the use of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the human body in international warfare.

The rationale behind this prohibition is rooted in the principle of unnecessary suffering. The Hague Conventions aim to balance military necessity with humanitarian considerations, prohibiting weapons deemed to cause excessive or gratuitous harm.

**Military Doctrine and Hollow Point Ammunition**

It's essential to understand that the Hague Conventions apply to international armed conflicts and do not explicitly prohibit using hollow point ammunition in all situations.

However, most modern militaries, including the United States Armed Forces, adhere to the spirit of the Hague Conventions even in non-international armed conflicts.

There are several reasons for this:


1. Ethical Considerations: Military leaders recognize the importance of minimizing unnecessary suffering, even in the context of war.


2. Reciprocity: The use of prohibited weapons by one side could lead to escalation and the use of similar weapons by the opposing force.


3. Public Perception: Using ammunition widely considered inhumane can damage a military's reputation and erode public support for its operations.

Exceptions and Special Circumstances

While adherence to the Hague Conventions is standard practice, some exceptions and special circumstances warrant consideration:


1. Non-Lethal Applications: Hollow point bullets are sometimes employed in less-lethal rounds used for riot control or animal control in military settings. These rounds are designed to incapacitate rather than kill.


2. Special Operations Forces: Due to the unique nature of their missions, special forces units may operate under different rules of engagement. However, even in these circumstances, the use of hollow points would be highly regulated and subject to strict rules of engagement.

Conclusion

The use of hollow point bullets in war is a complex issue with legal, ethical, and practical considerations. While the Hague Conventions prohibit their use in international armed conflicts, and most militaries adhere to this principle, exceptions may exist in highly specific situations.

Ultimately, the decision to use any weapon system, including specific ammunition types, is a grave responsibility entrusted to military commanders. Those decisions should always prioritize mission success, the safety of non-combatants, and the principles of humanitarian law.
read more >>

While hollow points are commonly used by police and civilians, they are banned in international warfare under the 1899 Hague Convention's early laws of war that the United States has followed even though the U.S. government never ratified the agreement.read more >>