As a seasoned software engineer with a deep understanding of version control systems, I can provide you with an insightful comparison between Bitbucket and Stash.

Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service that was acquired by Atlassian in 2010. It was specifically designed for the multi-tenant public cloud environment. Bitbucket Cloud is a service that allows users to host their Git repositories on remote servers managed by Atlassian. This service is particularly popular for its integration with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Trello, which makes it a powerful tool for teams that are already using the Atlassian suite.

On the other hand, Bitbucket Server, which was previously known as Stash, is an enterprise-grade, high-performance, self-managed Git repository hosting and collaboration tool. It was first released in May 2012. Unlike Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server is designed to be installed and run on the user's own servers, providing a more private and controlled environment for managing code repositories. This is particularly beneficial for organizations that have strict security requirements or prefer to keep their codebase in-house.

The key differences between Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) are as follows:


1. Hosting: Bitbucket is a cloud-based service, while Bitbucket Server is a self-hosted solution.

2. Integration: Both integrate well with Atlassian's suite of products, but Bitbucket Server can also be integrated with other tools and systems within an organization.

3. Security: Bitbucket Server offers more control over security as it is self-hosted, which is crucial for enterprises handling sensitive data.

4. Customization: Bitbucket Server allows for more customization and control over the environment, which can be an advantage for larger teams with specific needs.

5. Cost: Bitbucket Cloud operates on a subscription model, whereas Bitbucket Server requires an upfront license purchase and ongoing maintenance costs.

It's important to note that while Bitbucket Server was once known as Stash, it has evolved and now includes features that go beyond what Stash originally offered. The transition from Stash to Bitbucket Server signifies a progression in the product's capabilities and integration with Atlassian's ecosystem.

In summary, the choice between Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) will largely depend on the specific needs of your organization. If you require a cloud-based solution with easy setup and integration with Atlassian's tools, Bitbucket Cloud might be the right choice. However, if you are looking for a self-hosted, customizable, and secure solution that you can control and manage on your own servers, Bitbucket Server is the way to go.

read more >>

Bitbucket Server (previously known as Stash) was first released in May 2012 as an enterprise-grade, high performance, self-managed Git repository hosting and collaboration tool. ... Bitbucket Cloud (previously known as Bitbucket) was acquired by Atlassian in 2010 and was purpose-built for the multi-tenant public cloud.Jan 11, 2018read more >>