As an expert in the field of sports history, I can provide an insightful explanation for the unique scoring system in tennis. The scoring system is indeed one of the most peculiar aspects of the game, and it has a fascinating historical background rooted in medieval Europe.
The 15, 30, 40 scoring system is widely thought to have originated from medieval France, where the game of tennis was known as "jeu de paume," or "palm game," due to the use of the hand to hit the ball. The scoring system was likely influenced by the design of a traditional clock face, which was a common element in the culture of the time.
In this historical context, the court was imagined as a clock face, with each point scored corresponding to the movement of the clock hand. When a player scored their first point, it was marked as 15, which could be thought of as a quarter turn of the clock hand. The second point scored was 30, representing half of the clock face. The third point was 45, which is not used in modern tennis but was historically a part of the scoring system, indicating three-quarters of the clock face.
However, the scoring does not proceed to 45 in contemporary tennis. Instead, it jumps to 40. There are a few theories as to why this is the case. One theory suggests that the jump from 30 to 40 was made to make the game faster and more decisive. By reducing the points needed to win a game from four to three, matches could be completed more quickly, which was particularly important in an era when outdoor play was subject to weather conditions and limited daylight hours.
Another theory is that the scoring system was influenced by the game of "court tennis," a precursor to modern tennis. In court tennis, a game was won by scoring nine points, and the scoring was done in sets of three. So, when the clock face analogy was applied, the points were scored as 15, 30, and then 45. However, to align with the court tennis scoring, the 45 was adjusted to 40 to maintain the sets of three.
When a player reaches 40, they are not yet assured of winning the game. To win, a player must have a two-point advantage over their opponent. This is why a player might score a point from 30 to 40, but still need another point to win the game. This two-point lead requirement is known as the "advantage system" and is another unique aspect of tennis scoring.
The final point of clarification is the significance of 60. While it is not used in the scoring, 60 does hold a place in the history of tennis. As mentioned earlier, in the original concept, when the clock hand moved to 60, it signified the end of the game. This is why in tennis, a set is won by being the first to six games, with a two-game lead (or seven games with a two-game lead in the final set in some tournaments).
In summary, the 15, 30, 40 scoring system in tennis is a historical artifact that has been adapted and modified over time. It reflects the game's evolution from its medieval European origins to the modern sport we know today. The system is a testament to the game's rich history and the way in which cultural elements can become embedded in the rules and structure of a sport.
read more >>

The origins of the 15, 30, and 40 scores are believed to be medieval French. It is possible that a clock face was used on court, with a quarter move of the hand to indicate a score of 15, 30, and 45. When the hand moved to 60, the game was over. ... The 60 signifies the end of the game.read more >>