As an expert in the field of military history and international relations, I have spent a considerable amount of time studying the complexities of conflicts and their classifications. The Vietnam War, a significant event in the 20th century, is often a subject of debate regarding its classification as a war or a conflict. To address the question of why the Vietnam War was not considered a war, we must delve into the legal and political frameworks that define such terms, as well as the historical context in which the Vietnam War took place.

The Legal Definition of War:
In international law, a war is typically defined as a large-scale armed conflict that involves two or more states, or non-state actors with significant military capabilities, and is characterized by formal declarations of war, adherence to the laws of war, and recognition by the international community. The United States Congress, as the legislative body with the power to declare war, did not issue such a declaration regarding Vietnam. This lack of formal declaration is a critical factor in the classification of the Vietnam conflict.

The Nature of the Conflict:
The Vietnam War was a protracted struggle that involved guerrilla warfare, counterinsurgency, and conventional military tactics. It was a complex conflict with multiple parties, including the government of South Vietnam, the Viet Cong (a communist guerrilla force), the North Vietnamese Army, and the United States, among others. The nature of the conflict, with its irregular warfare and the involvement of non-state actors, made it distinct from traditional interstate wars.

The Political Context:
The political climate of the time also played a role in how the conflict was perceived and labeled. The Cold War was in full swing, and the Vietnam War was seen by many as a proxy war between the United States and the Soviet Union, with each side supporting different factions in Vietnam. This broader geopolitical struggle influenced the way the conflict was framed and discussed.

The Public Perception:
Public opinion in the United States and around the world was deeply divided over the Vietnam War. Many people viewed the conflict as an unjust intervention by the United States in the internal affairs of Vietnam. This perception, coupled with the lack of a formal declaration of war, contributed to the view that the conflict was not a traditional war.

The Aftermath and Legacy:
The Vietnam War ended without a clear victory for either side and left a lasting impact on the United States and Vietnam. The war's legacy has been the subject of much reflection and analysis, with many questioning the rationale behind the U.S. involvement and the means by which the conflict was conducted.

In conclusion, while the Vietnam War exhibited many characteristics of a traditional war, including active military operations, aggression, and a high mortality rate, its lack of a formal declaration by the United States Congress, the nature of the conflict, the political context of the Cold War, and the public perception of the conflict all contributed to it being considered a conflict rather than a war in the strictest sense.

read more >>

In other words, it's an open and armed hostility exemplified by active military operations, severe aggression and usually high mortality. By that definition, Vietnam was indeed a war. However, since the United States Congress never declared war against Vietnam, it was actually a conflict.Dec 3, 2012read more >>