As an expert in international relations and political geography, I can provide a comprehensive answer to your question regarding the status of Iraq. It is important to understand the distinction between a "state" and a "country" in the context of political science and international law.

Firstly, the term "state" in political science often refers to a political entity that possesses a centralized government, defined territory, and a permanent population. It is a concept that encompasses the institutions and apparatus of governance. A state has sovereignty, which means it has the power to govern itself without outside interference. It is also a member of the international community, recognized by other states and often a member of the United Nations.

On the other hand, the term "country" is more colloquial and can sometimes be used interchangeably with "state," but it can also refer to a nation with a shared identity, culture, language, or history. A country might not necessarily be a state in the formal sense if it lacks recognized sovereignty or centralized governance.

Iraq is recognized as a state by the international community. It has a defined territory, a government, and a population. It is a member of the United Nations and engages in international relations as a sovereign entity. The modern state of Iraq was established in 1921, following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, and it has undergone significant changes in its borders and governance structures over the years.

However, the situation in Iraq is complex due to the presence of various ethnic groups within its borders, including the Kurds. The Kurds are indeed a distinct ethnic group with their own language, culture, and history. They have sought greater autonomy and, in some cases, independence. The idea of Kurdistan refers to a region that is considered the historical homeland of the Kurds, which spans across parts of Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria.

The statement "Iraq is a state but not a nation" seems to suggest that while Iraq is a recognized political entity with statehood, it may not fully represent a unified nation in terms of ethnic, cultural, or historical identity. This is a nuanced point, as many states around the world encompass diverse ethnic groups and do not represent a single, homogenous nation.

The reference to "Kurdistan" being larger than Syria if it were a state is an interesting one. It implies that the Kurdish population and their historical homeland extend across a significant geographical area. However, it is important to note that while the concept of Kurdistan exists as a cultural and historical idea, it is not currently a recognized sovereign state. The Kurds in Iraq have made strides towards autonomy, particularly in the region of Iraqi Kurdistan, but this is still within the borders of the state of Iraq.

In conclusion, Iraq is a state with recognized sovereignty and international recognition. It is a complex political entity with a diverse population, including the Kurds who have their own distinct identity. The concept of a Kurdish state or nation, while culturally significant, does not align with the current political boundaries and international recognition of states.

read more >>

Iraq is a state but not a nation. Kurdistan is the opposite. Kurds are a distinct ethnic group, with their own language and culture. ... (The state of --Kurdistan,-- for example, would be larger than Syria, although part of the nation of Kurdistan is in Syria.)Jun 16, 2014read more >>