As a historian, I have spent considerable time studying the intricate web of events that led to the outbreak of World War II. The policy of appeasement is often cited as a significant factor that contributed to the onset of the war. Here's a detailed analysis of how this policy played a role in the lead-up to the conflict.
Step 1: English Answer
The policy of appeasement is generally defined as the conciliatory approach adopted by certain countries, particularly the United Kingdom and France, towards the aggressive expansionist policies of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy during the 1930s. The primary aim of this policy was to avoid another devastating war like the one that had just ended in 1918. However, it is important to understand that appeasement was not a monolithic policy but rather a series of decisions and actions that, in hindsight, are often criticized for their perceived failure to prevent the escalation of hostilities.
**The Treaty of Versailles and its Aftermath**
The Treaty of Versailles, signed at the end of World War I, imposed harsh penalties on Germany, including significant territorial losses, severe economic reparations, and military restrictions. The Rhineland, a region in western Germany, was demilitarized, meaning that Germany was not allowed to have any military presence there. This treaty, while intended to ensure peace, sowed the seeds of resentment and humiliation among the German people, which Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party would later exploit to rise to power.
The Rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party
Hitler's rise to power in 1933 was facilitated by a combination of economic depression, political instability, and a desire for a strong, nationalistic government. The Nazi Party capitalized on the widespread dissatisfaction with the Treaty of Versailles and the perceived weakness of the Weimar Republic. Hitler's aggressive foreign policy, including the remilitarization of the Rhineland in 1936, was a direct challenge to the international order established by the treaty.
The Appeasement Policy in Action
The policy of appeasement was most notably on display during the Munich Agreement of 1938, where Britain and France agreed to allow Germany to annex the Sudetenland, a region of Czechoslovakia with a significant ethnic German population. This decision was made in the hope that by appeasing Hitler's territorial ambitions, further conflict could be avoided. However, this act of appeasement had several negative consequences:
1. **Underestimation of Hitler's Intentions**: It reinforced the belief that Hitler could be satisfied with limited territorial gains, which was a grave miscalculation of his true intentions for European domination.

2. Weakening of Deterrence: By not responding to Hitler's earlier acts of aggression, such as the remilitarization of the Rhineland, the appeasers inadvertently weakened the deterrent effect of the League of Nations and the collective security system.

3. Emboldening Aggression: The lack of a firm response to German aggression emboldened Hitler, convincing him that the Western powers lacked the will to fight, which further encouraged his expansionist ambitions.

4. Loss of Time and Preparation: The policy bought Hitler time to build up Germany's military power without significant opposition, allowing him to prepare for the war he intended to wage.

5. Moral and Political Costs: The betrayal of Czechoslovakia at Munich had significant moral and political implications, damaging the credibility of Britain and France as reliable allies and weakening the resolve of other nations to resist German pressure.
The Outbreak of World War II
The culmination of appeasement policies came in September 1939 when Germany invaded Poland, an act that Britain and France could not ignore due to their mutual defense treaties with Poland. The failure of appeasement to prevent war led to a hardening of Allied positions and the eventual outbreak of World War II.
In conclusion, the policy of appeasement, while well-intentioned in its desire to avoid conflict, had the unintended consequence of enabling Hitler's aggressive expansion and ultimately contributed to the outbreak of World War II. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of compromising with aggressors and the importance of a robust and principled foreign policy.
**read more >>

We can argue that appeasement caused World War II because it allowed Hitler and the Nazis to build Germany's military power until it was strong enough to fight a major war. ... The Treaty of Versailles said Germany could not have military troops or installations in a region of Germany called the Rhineland.read more >>