As a domain expert in religious studies and history, I've spent considerable time examining the travels and missions of the apostles and disciples of Jesus Christ. The question you've asked is a fascinating one, as it delves into the historical and geographical aspects of early Christian missionary work. It's important to clarify that the term "Ethiopia" has been used in different contexts throughout history, which can lead to some confusion. Let's explore this in detail.

Step 1: English Answer

The Apostle Matthew is traditionally associated with a mission to the region known as "Ethiopia," but it's crucial to understand that this does not refer to the modern African country of Ethiopia. In ancient times, the term "Ethiopia" was often used to describe various regions south of the Caspian Sea, which were inhabited by people with dark skin, similar to the modern Ethiopians. This broader usage of the term is what we must consider when discussing the travels of the disciples.

Matthew, also known as Levi, was a tax collector by profession before his call to discipleship. He is the author of the Gospel of Matthew, which is the first book in the New Testament. According to Christian tradition, after the Ascension of Jesus, Matthew traveled to several regions to spread the teachings of Christianity. It is said that he went to the Parthian Empire (an ancient region corresponding to modern-day Iran) and from there, he is believed to have traveled further east to the region referred to as "Ethiopia."

The tradition that Matthew traveled with Andrew to this region is preserved in some early Christian writings. Andrew, the brother of Peter, is another significant figure in the early Christian church. He is often associated with missions in the regions of Asia Minor and Greece. However, the historical records regarding the travels of the disciples are not always consistent, and there is much debate among scholars about the accuracy of these traditions.

It's also worth noting that the Acts of the Apostles, a book in the New Testament, does not specifically mention a mission to "Ethiopia" in the context of Matthew or Andrew. The only mention of "Ethiopia" in the Acts is the account of the Ethiopian eunuch who comes to faith in Jesus after an encounter with Philip the Evangelist (Acts 8:26-40). This eunuch is described as a court official of the Candace, the queen of the Ethiopians, and his conversion is often seen as the beginning of the Christian church in the region.

The mission of the disciples to different parts of the world is a testament to the early Christian church's commitment to spreading the gospel message to all nations. The story of Matthew and Andrew's journey to "Ethiopia" is part of this broader narrative of Christian expansion and the establishment of churches in diverse geographical areas.

In conclusion, while the historical details surrounding the travels of the disciples can be complex and at times uncertain, the tradition that Matthew, along with Andrew, went to the region known as "Ethiopia" to preach the message of God is an important aspect of early Christian missionary history. It reflects the church's efforts to reach out to diverse cultures and peoples with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

**read more >>

Muslim exegesis preserves the tradition that Matthew, with Andrew, were the two disciples who went to Ethiopia (not the African country, but a region called 'Ethiopia' south of the Caspian Sea) to preach the message of God.read more >>