As a statistician with extensive experience in data analysis, I often encounter questions regarding the interpretation of statistical significance. When discussing the significance of a p-value, it's important to understand the context in which it is used. The p-value is a measure of the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. It answers the question: "What is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated from my sample data, if the null hypothesis is true?"

In the context of hypothesis testing, a significance level (denoted by α, often set at .05 or .01) is chosen before conducting the test. This level represents the threshold for deciding whether the results are statistically significant. If the p-value is less than this significance level, it suggests that the observed results are unlikely to have occurred by chance if the null hypothesis were true. In such cases, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Now, let's consider a p-value of .000. This value is extremely low, indicating a very strong evidence against the null hypothesis. It means that if the null hypothesis were true, the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as the one calculated from the sample data would be less than 0.000, which is much smaller than the conventional significance levels of .05 or .01.

The significance of .000 is indeed significant because it is substantially less than the typical thresholds used to determine statistical significance. When you encounter such a low p-value, it suggests that the results are highly unlikely to be due to random chance, and there is a strong indication that there is a real effect or difference that the study is investigating.

However, it's important to note that statistical significance does not equate to practical significance. A statistically significant result means that the findings are unlikely to be due to random variation, but it does not necessarily mean that the effect is large or important in a real-world context. The magnitude of the effect, the size of the sample, and the context of the study are all important considerations when interpreting the results.

Moreover, a very low p-value can sometimes be a red flag for potential issues such as multiple testing, data dredging, or p-hacking, where researchers may be capitalizing on chance to find statistically significant results. It's crucial to conduct the analysis with a clear hypothesis and to use appropriate statistical methods to avoid such pitfalls.

In summary, a p-value of .000 is highly significant statistically. It provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. However, it's essential to consider the broader context of the study, including the effect size, sample size, and potential limitations or biases, to fully understand the implications of the results.

read more >>

If your p-value is less than .05 you can reject the null (meaning there is in fact a statistically significant difference in the means and it is not due to sampling error). In this case, you can reject the null hypothesis (because the significance is .000, which is substantially less than .05).read more >>