As a subject matter expert in statistics and research methodology, I'd like to clarify the concept of a non-significant result in the context of statistical analysis. Understanding this concept is crucial for interpreting the results of scientific studies and making informed decisions based on data.
When we conduct a statistical test, we typically start with a null hypothesis (H0), which represents the status quo or the assumption of no effect or no difference. The alternative hypothesis (H1 or Ha) represents the opposite of the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is an effect or a difference. The goal of the test is to determine whether the data provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
A non-significant result occurs when the statistical test does not provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, the observed data is consistent with the assumption that there is no effect or no difference. This does not mean that the null hypothesis is true; rather, it means that the test has not provided sufficient evidence to conclude that there is an effect or a difference.
The significance level (denoted as α, alpha) is a predetermined threshold that we use to decide whether the result is significant or not. Commonly, a significance level of 0.05 is used, which means that there is a 5% chance of observing a result as extreme as the one obtained (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis were true. If the p-value, which is the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the one observed under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true, is less than the significance level, we say the result is statistically significant. If the p-value is greater than the significance level, the result is non-significant.
It's important to note that a non-significant result does not imply that the study was a failure or that the research question is unimportant. It simply means that the data did not provide enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. There could be several reasons for a non-significant result:

1. True Negative: The null hypothesis is indeed true, and there is no effect or difference to detect.

2. Lack of Power: The study may not have enough statistical power to detect an effect if one exists. This can happen if the sample size is too small, the effect size is too small, or there is too much variability in the data.

3. Poor Study Design: The study may be poorly designed, leading to a non-significant result. This could be due to issues such as poor randomization, lack of blinding, or inappropriate measurement instruments.

4. Random Chance: Even with a well-designed study, there is always a chance that the observed result is due to random variation in the data.

5. Publication Bias: There is a tendency for non-significant results to be less likely to be published, which can skew the perception of the evidence.

6. Multiple Testing: When multiple statistical tests are performed, the chance of obtaining a non-significant result increases, even if there is a true effect.
7.
Data Quality Issues: Non-significant results can also arise from issues with the quality of the data, such as measurement errors, missing data, or outliers.
In conclusion, a non-significant result is an outcome of a statistical test that does not provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It is essential to interpret such results with caution and consider the broader context of the study, including the study design, sample size, and potential limitations. It is also important to recognize that non-significance does not equate to a lack of importance or relevance of the research question.
read more >>

In principle, a statistically significant result (usually a difference) is a result that's not attributed to chance. More technically, it means that if the Null Hypothesis is true (which means there really is no difference), there's a low probability of getting a result that large or larger.Oct 21, 2014read more >>