As a statistician with a strong background in data analysis, I often encounter questions regarding the impact of extreme scores on different measures of central tendency. Central tendency is a concept that describes the center point of a data set, and there are several measures to determine it: mean, median, and mode. Each of these measures has its own advantages and disadvantages, especially when it comes to the influence of outliers or extreme scores.
Step 1: English Answer
When considering which measure of central tendency is most affected by extreme scores, it's important to understand how each measure is calculated and how it represents the data.
- Mean: The mean, often referred to as the average, is calculated by summing all the values in a data set and then dividing by the number of values. It is highly sensitive to outliers because each data point contributes to the total sum, and thus, extreme values can significantly skew the final average.
- Median: The median is the middle value in a data set when the numbers are arranged in ascending or descending order. If the number of observations is odd, the median is the value that lies at the exact middle. If the number of observations is even, the median is the average of the two middle numbers. The median is less affected by outliers because it only considers the middle position of the data set, not the magnitude of the extreme values.
- Mode: The mode is the value that appears most frequently in a data set. It is the least affected by extreme scores because it is based on the frequency of occurrence, not the value of the data points themselves.
Given these definitions, it is clear that the mean is the measure of central tendency that is most affected by extreme scores. This is due to the arithmetic nature of the mean, where each data point is weighted equally in the calculation. In contrast, the median is less sensitive because it focuses on the positional order of the data, and the mode is the least sensitive as it is concerned with the most frequent value, which may or may not be an extreme score.
The impact of outliers on the mean can be dramatic. For instance, in a data set of salaries where most people earn a moderate income but one individual earns a very high salary, the mean salary will be significantly higher than the median salary, which would be closer to the typical income of the majority. This is why the median is often preferred in situations where the distribution of data is skewed or contains outliers.
Advantages of the Median: The median is less affected by outliers and skewed data than the mean, and is usually the preferred measure of central tendency when the distribution is not symmetrical. This is particularly useful in real-world scenarios where data can often be skewed due to various factors, such as income distribution, housing prices, or the impact of a few extreme natural disasters on average damage costs.
In conclusion, when extreme scores are present in a data set, the mean is the measure of central tendency that is most likely to be distorted. The median offers a more robust alternative in these situations, providing a central value that is not unduly influenced by the outliers. The mode, while useful in its own right, is not typically affected by extreme scores in the same way as the mean or median because it is based on the frequency of data points rather than their value.
**read more >>

In a distribution with an odd number of observations, the median value is the middle value. Advantage of the median: The median is less affected by outliers and skewed data than the mean, and is usually the preferred measure of central tendency when the distribution is not symmetrical.Jul 3, 2013read more >>