As an expert in international relations and history, I can provide an analysis of the question regarding the only country that has never been ruled by another nation. It is a complex question because the concept of "rule" can be interpreted in various ways, and the historical context of nations is often subject to debate and revision. However, I will attempt to provide a comprehensive answer. Firstly, it's important to clarify what we mean by "rule." If we consider "rule" to mean direct political control or occupation by another nation, then the list of countries that have never been ruled by another is relatively short. However, if we consider "rule" to include cultural, economic, or indirect forms of influence, then it becomes nearly impossible to find a country that has been completely autonomous throughout its entire history. **Claims have been made that the Kamarupa Kingdom or Tibetan Empire conquered it during this time.** This statement suggests that there are historical claims of conquest over certain regions. The Kamarupa Kingdom, which existed in ancient India, and the Tibetan Empire, which was a powerful entity in the region, both had periods of expansion. However, conquest does not necessarily equate to long-term rule, and many regions have experienced periods of autonomy even after being conquered. **The British and Indians have also had considerable influence.** The British Empire, at its height, had a vast global reach and exerted significant influence over many countries, particularly through colonization. India, being a part of the British Empire for a long period, also had its own regional influences. However, influence and colonization are not the same as direct rule in perpetuity. **So most countries have never remained autonomous.** This statement is a general acknowledgment that throughout history, many nations have experienced some form of external control or influence. Autonomy is a fluid concept that can change over time with shifts in political power and international relations. **And Sweden, Nepal, and Bhutan (which has sketchy history) have come under major influence.** These three countries have indeed had periods where they were not under the direct rule of another nation. Sweden has a long history of independence, although it has been involved in various alliances and has exerted influence over neighboring territories at different times. Nepal has maintained a high degree of autonomy, especially considering its geographical location and the historical strength of its military. Bhutan's history is less well-documented, and it has been influenced by neighboring powers, but it has also had periods of self-governance. Given these considerations, it is challenging to identify a single country that has never been ruled by another nation in the absolute sense. However, some countries have managed to maintain a significant degree of autonomy for extended periods. It is also worth noting that the concept of a nation-state as we understand it today is a relatively recent development in human history, and many of the political entities that existed in the past would not fit neatly into our current understanding of national sovereignty. In conclusion, while no country can claim to have been entirely free from external influence or control at some point in its history, some have come closer to this ideal than others. The question of which country has never been ruled by another is more a matter of historical interpretation and the specific criteria used to define "rule." read more >>

Claims have been made that the Kamarupa Kingdom or Tibetan Empire conquered it during this time. The British and Indians have also had considerable influence. So most countries have never remained autonomous. And Sweden, Nepal, and Bhutan (which has sketchy history) have come under major influence.read more >>